Last week, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND) put forward a budget resolution. Although on the surface this is an unremarkable event – it is supposed to happen every year, before this time – the particulars were highly unusual. They underline the degree to which the process of budgeting in Washington is stalled.
The budget resolution, as you know, is an annual outline of the nation’s overall fiscal plan. It is a “joint resolution,” rather than a law, passed by the House and Senate without the president’s signature or his formal involvement, and it does not have the force of law. In most years, its major function is to set forth a ceiling for the amount of annual appropriations that the Congress may legislate. In some years, it also can provide instructions for changes in the law that governs taxes and mandatory (or “entitlement”) spending, which can be passed in the Senate by a simple majority, without the risk of a filibuster. This year, with political control of the Congress divided, meaningful changes in tax and entitlement policy are far out of reach. And beyond that, just last August, the Congress and the President negotiated a deal to set appropriations spending levels for this year while increasing the debt limit. So in some sense, a budget resolution this year might be thought unnecessary. Even so, many Members of Congress have often repeated, “If you can’t budget, you can’t govern.” And the Congress has not completed a budget resolution for three years.
